User talk:Craigy144

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5

File:Henry Keppel.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Henry Keppel.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Lokal _Profil 22:10, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Files missing description details

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the images may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:02, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:HolyTrinitySunderland-western(front)elevation.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:HolyTrinitySunderland-western(front)elevation.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 13:13, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Gibside(JohnDarch)Apr2006.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Gibside(JohnDarch)Apr2006.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:21, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Grey's Momument and Momument station - Newcastle upon Tyne - England - 130804.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Grey's Momument and Momument station - Newcastle upon Tyne - England - 130804.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 17:31, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Image-Newcastle castle keep 2.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Image-Newcastle castle keep 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:54, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Craigy144/Oldest peers

User:Craigy144/Oldest peers, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Craigy144/Oldest peers and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Craigy144/Oldest peers during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 05:55, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Craigy144/ECMS

User:Craigy144/ECMS, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Craigy144/ECMS and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Craigy144/ECMS during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:47, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Craigy144/Bessborough

User:Craigy144/Bessborough, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Craigy144/Bessborough and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Craigy144/Bessborough during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:48, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Frances Vane, Marchioness of Londonderry, from its old location at User:Craigy144/FAV. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:50, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:List of female peers, from its old location at User:Craigy144/sandbox/Female peers. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:56, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Rodhullandemu/Henry Curtis-Bennett

User:Rodhullandemu/Henry Curtis-Bennett, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rodhullandemu/Henry Curtis-Bennett (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Rodhullandemu/Henry Curtis-Bennett during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 11:00, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:List of upcoming extinct peerages, from its old location at User:Craigy144/Upcoming extinctions. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 11:06, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:High Street West, from its old location at User:Craigy144/HSW. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 11:08, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Craigy144/D2UK

User:Craigy144/D2UK, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Craigy144/D2UK and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Craigy144/D2UK during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 11:11, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Craigy144/sandbox/LLP

User:Craigy144/sandbox/LLP, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Craigy144/sandbox/LLP and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Craigy144/sandbox/LLP during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 11:17, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of godchildren of members of the British Royal Family for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of godchildren of members of the British Royal Family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of godchildren of members of the British Royal Family until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Re5x (talk) 04:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Frances Vane, Marchioness of Londonderry concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Frances Vane, Marchioness of Londonderry, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of upcoming extinct peerages concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of upcoming extinct peerages, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of female peers concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:List of female peers, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:High Street West concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:High Street West, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of female peers

Hello, Craigy144. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of female peers".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —MRD2014 T C 01:25, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:High Street West

Hello, Craigy144. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "High Street West".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —MRD2014 T C 01:33, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Georgina Kennard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Georgina Kennard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgina Kennard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tataral (talk) 02:13, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Feast of the Nativity listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Feast of the Nativity. Since you had some involvement with the Feast of the Nativity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. JZ CL 21:57, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alexander Fraser, 20th Lord Saltoun

The article Alexander Fraser, 20th Lord Saltoun has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no claim to notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 18:33, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:William George Hunt coa.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:William George Hunt coa.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sonia Rosemary Keppel

The article Sonia Rosemary Keppel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No claim to notability made, notability is not inherited. The only source that is specifically *about* her (and not a more famous relative) is ThePeerage.com, which profiles tens of thousands of people.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 14:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:NassauLux

Template:NassauLux has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:05, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mabell Ogilvy, Countess of Airlie.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:08, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:British courtesy barons

Template:British courtesy barons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:27, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Page of the Presence for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Page of the Presence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Page of the Presence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sandstein 16:19, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Mabell Ogilvy, Countess of Airlie.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mabell Ogilvy, Countess of Airlie.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aberconwyarms.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aberconwyarms.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Pius II coa.png

The file File:Pius II coa.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Vice-Lieutenants of Humberside

A tag has been placed on Category:Vice-Lieutenants of Humberside requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cameron Parker

The article Cameron Parker has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Less Unless (talk) 23:27, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Earl of Devon (Rivers).png

The file File:Earl of Devon (Rivers).png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coat of arms of Derbyshire County Council.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Derbyshire County Council.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coat of arms of Gloucestershire County Council.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Gloucestershire County Council.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:House of Hohenzollern (Germany)

A tag has been placed on Template:House of Hohenzollern (Germany) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DrKay (talk) 13:04, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Natalia Grosvenor, Duchess of Westminster for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natalia Grosvenor, Duchess of Westminster is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalia Grosvenor, Duchess of Westminster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 19:37, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Georgina Kennard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Georgina Kennard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Georgina Kennard (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Surtsicna (talk) 21:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Natalia Grosvenor, Duchess of Westminster" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Natalia Grosvenor, Duchess of Westminster. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 5#Natalia Grosvenor, Duchess of Westminster until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:01, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Denbighshirearms.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Denbighshirearms.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Royal Guelphic Order has been nominated for listification

Category:Royal Guelphic Order has been nominated for listification. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:14, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Royal Victorian Chain has been nominated for deletion

Category:Recipients of the Royal Victorian Chain has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (t · c) buidhe 03:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Eldest sons of barons has been nominated for renaming

Category:Eldest sons of barons has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:52, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:English courtesy viscountesses

A tag has been placed on Category:English courtesy viscountesses indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:16, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mary Somerset, Duchess of Beaufort for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary Somerset, Duchess of Beaufort is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Somerset, Duchess of Beaufort until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Surtsicna (talk) 18:17, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Dorset has been nominated for renaming

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Dorset has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RobinYad (talk) 19:31, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in County Durham has been nominated for renaming

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in County Durham has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RobinYad (talk) 19:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in East Sussex has been nominated for renaming

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in East Sussex has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RobinYad (talk) 19:57, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Essex has been nominated for renaming

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Essex has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RobinYad (talk) 19:58, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Gloucestershire has been nominated for renaming

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Gloucestershire has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RobinYad (talk) 19:59, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Hampshire has been nominated for renaming

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Hampshire has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RobinYad (talk) 20:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Hertfordshire has been nominated for renaming

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Hertfordshire has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RobinYad (talk) 20:02, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Kent has been nominated for renaming

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Kent has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RobinYad (talk) 20:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Lancashire has been nominated for renaming

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Lancashire has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RobinYad (talk) 20:09, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Leicestershire has been nominated for renaming

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Leicestershire has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RobinYad (talk) 20:10, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Oxfordshire has been nominated for renaming

Category:Scheduled Ancient Monuments in Oxfordshire has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RobinYad (talk) 20:11, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nigel Paulet, 18th Marquess of Winchester for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nigel Paulet, 18th Marquess of Winchester is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nigel Paulet, 18th Marquess of Winchester until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Pilaz (talk) 14:28, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:TWM line

Template:TWM line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:TWM two lines

Template:TWM two lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:29, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Green line link

Template:Green line link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:14, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Yellow line link

Template:Yellow line link has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:19, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alastair Morrison, 3rd Baron Margadale for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alastair Morrison, 3rd Baron Margadale is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alastair Morrison, 3rd Baron Margadale until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pilaz (talk) 01:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:British courtesy viscounts

Template:British courtesy viscounts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Pilaz (talk) 18:22, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Eastridingarms.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eastridingarms.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Daughters of barons has been nominated for deletion

Category:Daughters of barons has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 03:28, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Younger sons of barons has been nominated for deletion

Category:Younger sons of barons has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:07, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Eldest sons of British hereditary barons has been nominated for deletion

Category:Eldest sons of British hereditary barons has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 12:56, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael Bowes-Lyon

The article Michael Bowes-Lyon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The common first name of the 17th earl is Fergus, the article has been changed accordingly, no need for disambiguation. This could redirect to the 18th or an article could later be created for the son of the 13th earl.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walco1 (talk) 12:54, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Pre-1876 life peers has been nominated for renaming

Category:Pre-1876 life peers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. House Blaster (talk • he/they) 00:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]